[PATCH] ARM: dts: imx27 phyCARD-S remove wrong I2C RTC
Markus Pargmann
mpa at pengutronix.de
Sun Jul 7 20:44:52 EST 2013
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:31:41PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:51:58PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > > > Fixup of commit 7874d595b78e431f0f661d2fe47625649308a52e
> > > > "ARM: dts: Add device tree support for phycard pca100".
> > > >
> > > > Remove wrong I2C RTC node.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa at pengutronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, Alexander, you are right. I2C2 has no RTC.
> > > ...
> > >
> > > There are a couple of comments on this file.
> > >
> > > I think that the OWIRE should be moved to the RDK.
> >
> > I moved OWIRE and i2c1 to RDK. Both are not used on the SOM.
> >
> > > ioexpander must contain "gpio-controller" at least, and for use it further,
> > > it is necessary to define the label for this node.
> >
> > I checked all I2C devices in the board schematics. There is actually no
> > ioexpander. I don't know why it was added. I will send some I2C patches
> > later.
>
> Perhaps the chip is mounted on the camera module.
> A similar IC is exist on PCM-970 camera addon device.
> If so, the device should also be moved to RDK.
Yes that's possible. But in that case I think the ioexpander should be
removed from both dts files because the Phytec phyCARD-S RDK does not
include a camera module.
Regards,
Markus
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list