[PATCH v2 4/9] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks
Luciano Coelho
coelho at ti.com
Wed Jul 3 06:27:30 EST 2013
On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:02 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:55-20130702, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the
> > different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead. Also add a
> > boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not.
> >
> > Change all board files to reflect this.
> >
> > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com>
> > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho at ti.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 3 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 5 ++-
> ^^
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c | 3 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c | 3 +-
> ^^
> Please do not add more platform data to platforms that are DT only.
Ah, I hadn't realized that board_omap4panda.c and board-4430sdp.c had
been removed in linux-next. I base my tree on wireless-next and it
doesn't contain these changes yet. I would only have noticed this when
I rebased my tree once the merge window is closed. ;)
Thanks for pointing out, I'll make sure these changes will not be there
when I send the pull request.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list