[PATCH v3 0/4] Adding usb2.0 host-phy support for exynos5250

[Vivek Gautam]

Hi Balbi,


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:12:36PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> This patchset is based on the work by Praveen Paneri for
>> samsung-usbphy driver:
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12653
>>
>> Changes from v2:
>>  - Using "EXYNOS5_PHY_" as common prefix along with exact names for
>>    PHY SFRs for register definitions
>>  - Using register names with bit macros to make things more clear.
>>  - Removed parentheses around 0x230 in definition for EXYNOS5_USB_CFG
>>    in [patch 2/4 v2].
>>
>> Tested on smdk5250 target with usb-next branch along with arch patches
>> for exynos5250:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13042
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13048
>>
>> Vivek Gautam (4):
>>   usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support to samsung-phy driver
>>   ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver
>>   USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support
>>   USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support
>
> I really don't know what to do with this series. I know it depends on
> the other PHY changes which I have in my queue, but it touches too much
> arch specific code, plus the USB Host code which I don't maintain.
>

True, that it has dependency on the work by Praveen Paneri for samsung-usbphy
driver plus the arch support patches.

This is based on usb-next branch, so the host-code can be taken care of ?

> On top of all that, I have no platform to test these patches, which
> makes me even more worried about signing off under this series ;-)
>
The patches have however been tested. The two patches:
"USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support",
"USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support" have been acked by Jingoo Han
based on the patch-series.

Possibly Kukjin Kim can help on this one.

Kukjin,
Can we have a thought on this please.

> Would it be ok if we delay this to v3.9 ? At least the dependency with
> other PHY changes would be dropped by then.
>
This changes are almost in shape ;-) and i am updating the next patchset soon.
If possible can we try to get this in 3.8 please. :-)

> --
> balbi


-- 
Thanks & Regards
Vivek