[PATCH v3 0/4] Adding usb2.0 host-phy support for exynos5250

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:12:36PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> This patchset is based on the work by Praveen Paneri for
> samsung-usbphy driver:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/12653
> 
> Changes from v2:
>  - Using "EXYNOS5_PHY_" as common prefix along with exact names for
>    PHY SFRs for register definitions
>  - Using register names with bit macros to make things more clear.
>  - Removed parentheses around 0x230 in definition for EXYNOS5_USB_CFG
>    in [patch 2/4 v2].
> 
> Tested on smdk5250 target with usb-next branch along with arch patches
> for exynos5250:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13042
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/13048
> 
> Vivek Gautam (4):
>   usb: phy: samsung: Add host phy support to samsung-phy driver
>   ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling samsung-usbphy driver
>   USB: ehci-s5p: Add phy driver support
>   USB: ohci-exynos: Add phy driver support

I really don't know what to do with this series. I know it depends on
the other PHY changes which I have in my queue, but it touches too much
arch specific code, plus the USB Host code which I don't maintain.

On top of all that, I have no platform to test these patches, which
makes me even more worried about signing off under this series ;-)

Would it be ok if we delay this to v3.9 ? At least the dependency with
other PHY changes would be dropped by then.

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20121106/7720866b/attachment.sig>