kirkwood devicetree respin
Haojian Zhuang
haojian.zhuang at gmail.com
Wed Mar 21 19:42:28 EST 2012
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 04:21:45PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Nicolas Pitre <nico at fluxnic.net> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> >
>> >> ehci-orion only makes sense on PLAT_ORION, and they never have any
>> >> other platform ehci driver.
>> >>
>> >> ehci-mv only makese sense on PLAT_PXA, and they ?also don't have any
>> >> other platform ehci driver.
>> >
>> > BTW, as someone who once was the active maintainer for PXA, and later
>> > the active maintainer for Orion, I should say that ehci-mv is a terribly
>> > bad name (as demonstrated, not all Marvell SOCs use ehci-mv) and
>> > confusion would be much reduced if it was renamed to ehci-pxa.
>> >
>> >
>> OK. We could try to rename ehci-mv to ehci-pxa.
>>
>> By the way, we aren't allowed to append "depends on PLAT_PXA" in Kconfig.
>
> Hi Hoajian
>
> Could you explain that a bit more? What was the reason you could not
> append it? Is the driver used by some other platform as well?
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
The driver isn't used by any other platform. It's only used in
arch-pxa & arch-mmp.
I can't find the original mail. But I remembered that maintainer said
the driver should be built with any other platform, even with x86. So
we aren't allowed to append it in Kconfig.
Best Regards
Haojian
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list