[PATCH v5 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Update & move usb-phy types to generic include layer

[Vivek Gautam]

Hi Doug,

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
> Vivek,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Vivek,
>>>
>>> Since you're changing the name, I would have expected to see a removal
>>> of the old enum type in this patch.  I don't see it.  After applying
>>> all of your patches I find that S5P_USB_PHY_HOST and
>>> S5P_USB_PHY_DEVICE are still defined and used.
>>>
>>
>> True that we should have removed the earlier defined enums, infact i
>> did the same
>> in patchset v4 for this series. But since in this patchset i separated
>> out drivers and
>> architecture part, i thought it would be easier to remove them in one
>> shot in a latter commit
>> which will actually touch upon all architecture related code
>> (mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c,
>> mach-s5pv210/setup-usb-phy.c, and include/plat/usb-phy.h) once this
>> approach is accepted.
>>
>>> $ git grep S5P_USB_PHY_HOST
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c:   else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/setup-usb-phy.c:   else if (type == S5P_USB_PHY_HOST)
>>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/usb-phy.h:   S5P_USB_PHY_HOST,
>>>
>>> I believe that those usages of the old enum should also be switched
>>> over and the old enum removed.
>>>
>> Sure, those enums need to be removed.
>> If you say i will submit a patch for the same.
>
> It would be nice to add it to the patch series in the next version.  Thanks!
>

Sure i shall add the same to the arch patches in the next version, or
if needed will send a separate patch for this.

> -Doug



-- 
Thanks & Regards
Vivek