[PATCH 3/3] gpio-vx855: Add device tree binding
Daniel Drake
dsd at laptop.org
Wed Sep 21 23:04:53 EST 2011
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie at opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:02:14PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>> +- #gpio-cells : Should be two. The first cell is the pin number and the
>> + second cell is used to specify optional parameters:
>> + - bit 0 specifies polarity (0 for normal, 1 for inverted)
>
> Shouldn't we just have a property for the polarity?
Can't comment on the general design, but the way it is
described/implemented in the patch is consistent with GPIO controllers
in general in the kernel. e.g. its the same as gpio_nvidia, and it is
then driven by the generic gpio/dt code rather than having to
implement extra stuff in the vx855 driver.
Daniel
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list