dec behavior question
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Oct 26 00:41:55 EST 2011
On Oct 25, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devicetree-discuss-bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale.com at lists.ozlabs.org
>> [mailto:devicetree-discuss-bounces+stuart.yoder=freescale.com at lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of
>> David Gibson
>> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 6:15 PM
>> To: Kumar Gala
>> Cc: devicetree-discuss
>> Subject: Re: dec behavior question
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 09:01:49AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> If I have something like:
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>> spi.dtsi:
>>>
>>> &spi0 {
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <0>;
>>> compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-espi";
>>> reg = <0x7000 0x1000>;
>>> interrupts = <59 0x2 0 0>;
>>> };
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>
>>> foo.dts:
>>>
>>> spi0: spi at f00bar {
>>> compatible = "FOOBAR";
>>> };
>>>
>>> /include/ "spi.dtsi"
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>
>>> What do you expect the resulting dtb to look like w/regards to the
>>> compatible node?
>>
>> It's always last tree wins. So it will end up with compatible = "FOOBAR".
>
> If last wins, then it would be the included file
> (compatible = "fsl,mpc8536-espi"), no?
>
> Stuart
I don't believe so because the include of spi.dtsi doesn't actually instantiate a node. This is a little different than use of 'include' for merging of nodes.
- k
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list