[PATCHv2 02/10] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler
Russell King - ARM Linux
linux at arm.linux.org.uk
Fri Nov 4 00:31:02 EST 2011
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> > while (stat) {
> > while (stat) {
> > irq = ffs(stat) - 1;
> > stat &= ~(1 << irq);
> > handle_irq(irq);
> > }
> > stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> > }
> >
> > This ensures that we process all interrupts found pending before we
> > re-check for any new interrupts pending. Arguably this is a much
> > fairer implementation (and may mean if things get irrevokably stuck,
> > things like sysrq via the console uart may still work.)
>
> I really like the looks of this, Jamie can you do it like that?
>
> Maybe some smallish comment about what's going on can be
> good for future generations reading that code...
Bear in mind that it gets a little more complex when you have more
than one VIC, because the outer loop should be across all VICs.
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list