[PATCHv2 02/10] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler
Jamie Iles
jamie at jamieiles.com
Fri Nov 4 00:04:18 EST 2011
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 02:00:15PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> > while (stat) {
> > while (stat) {
> > irq = ffs(stat) - 1;
> > stat &= ~(1 << irq);
> > handle_irq(irq);
> > }
> > stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> > }
> >
> > This ensures that we process all interrupts found pending before we
> > re-check for any new interrupts pending. Arguably this is a much
> > fairer implementation (and may mean if things get irrevokably stuck,
> > things like sysrq via the console uart may still work.)
>
> I really like the looks of this, Jamie can you do it like that?
Yup, I'll respin either tonight or tomorrow night and rebase ontop of
the asm/exception.h patch. Do we also want the behaviour so that it
keeps looping over all VIC's until there are no pending interrupts? I
think that's probably worth it.
> Maybe some smallish comment about what's going on can be
> good for future generations reading that code...
OK, will do.
Thanks Linus and Russell!
Jamie
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list