[PATCH 0/5] consolidate sdhci pltfm & OF drivers and get them self registered
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Thu Mar 31 15:56:39 EST 2011
On Mar 30, 2011 10:23 PM, "Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo at freescale.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 04:48:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Here are what the patch set does.
> >
> > * Remove .probe and .remove hooks from sdhci-pltfm.c and make it be
> > a pure common helper function providers.
> > * Add .probe and .remove hooks for sdhci pltfm drivers sdhci-cns3xxx,
> > sdhci-dove, sdhci-tegra, and sdhci-esdhc-imx to make them self
> > registered with calling helper functions created above.
> > * Migrate the use of sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data to
> > sdhci_pltfm_host and sdhci_pltfm_data, so that OF version host and
> > data structure works can be saved, and pltfm version works for both
> > cases.
> > * Add OF common helper stuff into sdhci-pltfm.c, and make OF version
> > sdhci drivers sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-of-hlwd become self
> > registered as well, so that sdhci-of-core.c and sdhci-of.h can be
> > removed.
> > * Consolidate the OF and pltfm esdhc drivers into one with sharing
> > the same pair of .probe and .remove hooks. As a result,
> > sdhci-esdhc-imx.c and sdhci-of-esdhc.c go away, while
> > sdhci-esdhc.c comes in and works for both MPCxxx and i.MX.
> > * Eliminate include/linux/mmc/sdhci-pltfm.h with moving stuff into
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.h.
> >
> > And the benefits we gain from the changes are:
> >
> > * Get the sdhci device driver follow the Linux trend that driver
> > makes the registration by its own.
> > * sdhci-pltfm.c becomes simple and clean as it only has common helper
> > stuff there now.
> > * All sdhci device specific things are going back its own driver.
> > * The dt and non-dt drivers are consolidated to use the same pair of
> > .probe and .remove hooks.
> > * SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC controller found on both MPCxxx
> > and i.MX platforms is consolidated to use the same one .probe
> > function.
> >
> > The patch set works against the tree below, and was only tested on
> > i.mx51 babbage board, all other targets were build tested.
> >
> > git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git devicetree/test
> >
> > Comments are welcomed and appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shawn
> >
> > PS: The first patch is a squashing of the patch set below, which was
> > posted for review a few days back.
> >
> > [PATCH 0/5] make sdhci device drivers self registered
> >
> > Some patches in this series are relatively large, involving more
> > changes than expected, I chose to not split considering they are
> > logically integral, and doing so can reduce the patch quantity much,
> > and make bisect much easier. But sorry for that it makes reviewers'
> > life harder.
> >
> > Shawn Guo (5):
> > mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-pltfm device drivers self registered
> > mmc: sdhci: eliminate sdhci_of_host and sdhci_of_data
> > mmc: sdhci: make sdhci-of device drivers self registered
> > mmc: sdhci: consolidate sdhci-of-esdhc and sdhci-esdhc-imx
> > mmc: sdhci: merge two sdhci-pltfm.h into one
> >
> > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 71 ++++---
> > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 17 +-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-cns3xxx.c | 68 ++++++-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dove.c | 69 ++++++-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 149 -------------
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc.c | 412
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-core.c | 247 ---------------------
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 89 --------
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-hlwd.c | 89 +++++++-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of.h | 42 ----
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c | 251 +++++++++-------------
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.h | 36 +++-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 187 ++++++++++-------
> > include/linux/mmc/sdhci-pltfm.h | 35 ---
> > 14 files changed, 912 insertions(+), 850 deletions(-)
> > --
>
> Any comments? Is this the right direction to move?
I think it is, but I'll try to get you a full review tomorrow.
g.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linaro-dev mailing list
> linaro-dev at lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20110330/c4a5bd10/attachment.html>
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list