[PATCH 0/2] Character literal parsing

[Anton Staaf]

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 2:11 PM, David Brown <davidb at codeaurora.org> wrote:

>
> Also, the dts form is defined in the ePAPR documents, and this would be
> a (minor) divergence from that.
>
>
Thanks for the pointer, I had not read the ePAPR docs, I scanned them (will
read in more depth later) and didn't find any surprises.

So I guess the question is, are we comfortable with a divergence from the
spec there, and if so, are character literals generally useful enough to be
considered for inclusion in the canonical dtc?  Jon, do you have a feeling
one way or the other about character literal support?

Thanks,
    Anton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20110624/7fc5abfe/attachment.html>