[PATCH 0/2] Character literal parsing

[Anton Staaf]

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:02 PM, David Brown <davidb at codeaurora.org> wrote:

>
> Does this mean that the dtc inside the kernel is going to be the
> required tool to use to build device trees?  This change doesn't change
> the DTB format, so it's as much of a concern, but was wondering if we're
> intending to keep things compatible.
>

To be honest, I don't know enough to say either way.  I am using the
character
literals in a device tree that is used to configure a single firmware image
for
multiple boards.  That device tree is not currently passed on to the kernel.

Your question makes me think that there are two device tree compilers that I
should be paying attention to, is that the case?  Or was it a more general
comment about diverging from a historic syntax for device tree source files?

Thanks,
    Anton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/attachments/20110624/d7e1bc19/attachment-0001.html>