[PATCH v3] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Jul 6 21:55:26 EST 2011
On Tuesday 05 July 2011, Rob Herring wrote:
> How about something like this:
>
> > if (is_pl310) {
> > if (tag[0] && tag[1] && tag[2])
> > writel_relaxed(
> > ((tag[0] - 1) << L2X0_LATENCY_CTRL_RD_SHIFT) |
> > ((tag[1] - 1) << L2X0_LATENCY_CTRL_WR_SHIFT) |
> > ((tag[2] - 1) << L2X0_LATENCY_CTRL_SETUP_SHIFT),
> > l2x0_base + L2X0_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL);
> >
> > if (data[0] && data[1] && data[2])
> > writel_relaxed(
> > ((data[0] - 1) << L2X0_LATENCY_CTRL_RD_SHIFT) |
> > ((data[1] - 1) << L2X0_LATENCY_CTRL_WR_SHIFT) |
> > ((data[2] - 1) << L2X0_LATENCY_CTRL_SETUP_SHIFT),
> > l2x0_base + L2X0_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL);
> >
> > return;
> > }
Sorry if this is degrading into bike-shedding, but I think the cleanest
way to handle this kind of difference is to have separate functions
for pl3xx and l2xx. You can even remove the entire of_device_is_compatible()
check if you use the data field in the match table:
static const struct of_device_id l2x0_ids[] __initconst = {
{ .compatible = "arm,pl310-cache", .data = &l310_of_set_ram_timings },
{ .compatible = "arm,l220-cache", .data = &l2x0_of_set_ram_timings },
{ .compatible = "arm,l210-cache", .data = &l2x0_of_set_ram_timings },
{}
};
int __init l2x0_of_init(__u32 aux_val, __u32 aux_mask)
{
struct device_node *np;
void (*set_ram_timings)(const struct device_node *np,
__u32 *aux_val, __u32 *aux_mask);
void __iomem *l2_base;
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, l2x0_ids);
if (!np)
return -ENODEV;
l2_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
if (!l2_base)
return -ENOMEM;
l2x0_of_set_address_filter(np);
set_ram_timings = of_match_node(np, lx20_ids)->data;
set_ram_timings(np, &aux_val, &aux_mask);
l2x0_init(l2_base, aux_val, aux_mask);
return 0;
}
Either that, or a simpler
if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "arm,pl310-cache"))
l310_of_set_ram_timings(np, &aux_val, &aux_mask);
else
l2x0_of_set_address_filter(np, &aux_val, &aux_mask);)
Arnd
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list