[PATCH v2 01/17] fdt: Tidy up a few fdtdec problems
Stephen Warren
swarren at nvidia.com
Tue Dec 6 09:07:13 EST 2011
On 12/05/2011 02:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com> wrote:
>> On 12/02/2011 07:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> ...
>>> +int fdtdec_get_is_enabled(const void *blob, int node)
>>> {
>>> const char *cell;
>>>
>>> cell = fdt_getprop(blob, node, "status", NULL);
>>> if (cell)
>>> - return 0 == strcmp(cell, "ok");
>>> - return default_val;
>>> + return 0 == strcmp(cell, "okay");
>>> + return 1;
>>> }
>>
>> The kernel accepts both okay (standard) and ok (non-standard). I assume
>> the latter is required for some in-use-but-technically-incorrect .dts
>> files. I imagine U-Boot should act like the kernel here.
>
> Given that we are just starting out with fdt, do you think it would be
> better to not bloat the code in this way? I don't mind either way -
> just asking :-)
My point is that there are probably .dts files using "ok" instead of
"okay" or the kernel wouldn't support "ok". People will probably want to
use those with U-Boot without changing anything else. So, U-Boot should
interpret the FDT in the same way as the kernel.
--
nvpublic
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list