esdhc binding compatiable
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue May 5 21:10:50 EST 2009
>>> not obvious that "fsl,esdhc" is really "fsl,esdhc-v1.0".
>> minor nit: I'd remove the "-v" to make it "fsl,esdhc1.0". It's
>> really
>> no loss of clarity, and it saves space.
>
> I don't really care one way or another about the "v", but I like the
> dash. It looks a little too smooshed together without it.
Agreed, and it resolves things like ddr2-1.0 or ddr2-v1.0.
- k
More information about the devicetree-discuss
mailing list