esdhc binding compatiable

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue May 5 21:10:50 EST 2009


>>> not obvious that "fsl,esdhc" is really "fsl,esdhc-v1.0".
>> minor nit:  I'd remove the "-v" to make it "fsl,esdhc1.0".  It's  
>> really
>> no loss of clarity, and it saves space.
>
> I don't really care one way or another about the "v", but I like the  
> dash.  It looks a little too smooshed together without it.

Agreed, and it resolves things like ddr2-1.0 or ddr2-v1.0.

- k



More information about the devicetree-discuss mailing list