[Auugps] Incorporation

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2008-Oct-27 15:09:49 +1100, Christopher Vance <cjsvance at gmail.com> wrote:
>It looks more and more that the only reason to kill off AUUG is that
>the membership fees are too high.

Agreed.  But the existing structure also has implicit expenses that
moving to (eg) ACT would seem to reduce.

> If the existing board could be
>convinced to drop fees to $10/year or less, would some of you join the
>existing AUUG again? Would you be prepared to sit on the board long
>enough to clean up the constitution?

As I've previously implied, I'd be happy to re-join at a membership
fee that is commensurate with the services - $10/year would seem
reasonable.  I'm not sure that I've got the spare time to sit on the
Board - and it would be silly to nominate unless I can do the position
justice.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/auugps/attachments/20081027/76723a95/attachment.pgp>