[SLOF] [PATCH] slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs: improve checking for DOS boot partitions
Thomas Huth
thuth at redhat.com
Mon Mar 18 21:12:03 AEDT 2024
On 18/03/2024 06.14, Kautuk Consul wrote:
> Hi,
>>
>> On 2024-02-22 01:10:46, Kautuk Consul wrote:
>>> While testing with a qcow2 with a DOS boot partition it was found that
>>> when we set the logical_block_size in the guest XML to >512 then the
>>> boot would fail
...
>>> diff --git a/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs b/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs
>>> index 661c6b0..e680847 100644
>>> --- a/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs
>>> +++ b/slof/fs/packages/disk-label.fs
>>> @@ -139,6 +139,13 @@ CONSTANT /gpt-part-entry
>>> block block-size read drop \ read sector
>>> ;
>>>
>>> +\ read sector to array "block" and return actual bytes read
>>> +: read-sector-ret ( sector-number -- actual)
Please add a space between "actual" and ")". I'd maybe also rather say
"actual-bytes" so that nobody expects "actual-sectors" here.
>>> + \ block-size is 0x200 on disks, 0x800 on cdrom drives
>>> + block-size * 0 seek drop \ seek to sector
>>> + block block-size read \ read sector
>>> +;
Could we please avoid duplicating code here? "read-sector" could now simply
be implemented via read-sector-ret instead:
\ read sector to array "block" and return actual bytes read
: read-sector-ret ( sector-number -- actual-bytes )
\ block-size is 0x200 on disks, 0x800 on cdrom drives
block-size * 0 seek drop \ seek to sector
block block-size read \ read sector
;
: read-sector ( sector-number -- )
read-sector-ret drop
;
>>> : (.part-entry) ( part-entry )
>>> cr ." part-entry>active: " dup part-entry>active c@ .d
>>> cr ." part-entry>start-head: " dup part-entry>start-head c@ .d
>>> @@ -204,7 +211,8 @@ CONSTANT /gpt-part-entry
>>> part-entry>sector-offset l at -le ( current sector )
>>> dup to part-start to lpart-start ( current )
>>> BEGIN
>>> - part-start read-sector \ read EBR
>>> + part-start read-sector-ret \ read EBR
>>> + block-size < IF UNLOOP 0 EXIT THEN
>>> 1 partition>start-sector IF
>>> \ ." Logical Partition found at " part-start .d cr
>>> 1+
>>> @@ -279,6 +287,7 @@ CONSTANT /gpt-part-entry
>>> THEN
>>>
>>> count-dos-logical-partitions TO dos-logical-partitions
>>> + dos-logical-partitions 0= IF false EXIT THEN
>>>
>>> debug-disk-label? IF
>>> ." Found " dos-logical-partitions .d ." logical partitions" cr
>>> @@ -352,6 +361,7 @@ CONSTANT /gpt-part-entry
>>> no-mbr? IF drop FALSE EXIT THEN \ read MBR and check for DOS disk-label magic
>>>
>>> count-dos-logical-partitions TO dos-logical-partitions
>>> + dos-logical-partitions 0= IF 0 EXIT THEN
>>>
>>> debug-disk-label? IF
>>> ." Found " dos-logical-partitions .d ." logical partitions" cr
>>> --
>>> 2.31.1
>>>
>
> So how does the patch look ? Any comments from anyone ?
Sorry, your original patch somehow didn't make it to my Inbox (though it's
visible on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/slof/list/ so the problem is
certainly on my receiving side), so I just learnt about this patch today.
Anyway, apart from the code duplication, it looks fine to me, so if you
could fix that in a v2, that would be great!
Thomas
More information about the SLOF
mailing list