[SLOF] [PATCH slof 07/13] e1000: Compile with -Wextra
Alexey Kardashevskiy
aik at ozlabs.ru
Fri Jan 29 13:01:54 AEDT 2021
On 29/01/2021 02:04, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27/01/2021 09.57, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> -Wextra enables a bunch of rather useful checks which this fixes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>> lib/libe1k/e1k.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/libe1k/e1k.c b/lib/libe1k/e1k.c
>> index 4dd7d2eb97c2..3bbc75fba199 100644
>> --- a/lib/libe1k/e1k.c
>> +++ b/lib/libe1k/e1k.c
>> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static const e1k_dev_t e1k_dev[] = {
>> { 0x1016, E1K_82540, "82540EP Mobile" },
>> { 0x1017, E1K_82540, "82540EP Desktop" },
>> { 0x100E, E1K_82540, "82540EM Desktop" },
>> - { 0 , 0 }
>> + { 0 }
>> };
>
> Ack for the above change (or you could simply add a NULL as third
> parameter), but are the changes below really required?
These was a warning that the third parameter is not initialized. So it
could be either one zero or three zeroes. I find one more future proof.
> Seem like you
> only tried to get rid of the unused-parameter warnings which you finally
> switched off anyway?
No, it is a different warning. Thanks,
>
> Thomas
>
>
>> /*
>> @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ check_driver(uint16_t vendor_id, uint16_t device_id);
>> static int e1k_init(net_driver_t *driver);
>> static int e1k_term(void);
>> -static int e1k_xmit(char *f_buffer_pc, int f_len_i);
>> -static int e1k_receive(char *f_buffer_pc, int f_len_i);
>> +static int e1k_xmit(char *f_buffer_pc, unsigned f_len_i);
>> +static int e1k_receive(char *f_buffer_pc, unsigned f_len_i);
>> /**
>> * Translate virtual to "physical" address, ie. an address
>> @@ -549,11 +549,11 @@ e1k_mac_init(uint8_t *f_mac_pu08)
>> * e1k_receive
>> */
>> static int
>> -e1k_receive(char *f_buffer_pc, int f_len_i)
>> +e1k_receive(char *f_buffer_pc, unsigned f_len_i)
>> {
>> uint32_t l_rdh_u32 = e1k_rd32(RDH); // this includes
>> needed dummy read
>> e1k_rx_desc_st *rx;
>> - int l_ret_i;
>> + unsigned l_ret_i;
>> #ifdef E1K_DEBUG
>> #ifdef E1K_SHOW_RCV_DATA
>> @@ -589,11 +589,11 @@ e1k_receive(char *f_buffer_pc, int f_len_i)
>> * copy the data
>> */
>> memcpy((uint8_t *) f_buffer_pc,
>> dma2virt(bswap_64(rx->m_buffer_u64)),
>> - (size_t) l_ret_i);
>> + (size_t) MIN(l_ret_i, f_len_i));
>> #ifdef E1K_DEBUG
>> #if defined(E1K_SHOW_RCV) || defined(E1K_SHOW_RCV_DATA)
>> - printf("e1k: %d bytes received\n", l_ret_i);
>> + printf("e1k: %d bytes received (max %d)\n", l_ret_i, f_len_i);
>> #endif
>> #ifdef E1K_SHOW_RCV_DATA
>> @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ e1k_receive(char *f_buffer_pc, int f_len_i)
>> }
>> static int
>> -e1k_xmit(char *f_buffer_pc, int f_len_i)
>> +e1k_xmit(char *f_buffer_pc, unsigned f_len_i)
>> {
>> uint32_t l_tdh_u32 = e1k_rd32(TDH);
>> uint32_t l_tdt_u32 = e1k_rd32(TDT);
>>
>
--
Alexey
More information about the SLOF
mailing list