[SLOF] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-serial: Rework shutdown sequence
Greg Kurz
groug at kaod.org
Fri Mar 13 04:04:56 AEDT 2020
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:49:35 -0500
Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 02:38:22PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > On 10/03/2020 11:35, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > >> --- a/board-qemu/slof/virtio-serial.fs
> > >> +++ b/board-qemu/slof/virtio-serial.fs
> > >> @@ -19,13 +19,8 @@ virtio-setup-vd VALUE virtiodev
> > >> \ Quiescence the virtqueue of this device so that no more background
> > >> \ transactions can be pending.
> > >> : shutdown ( -- )
> > >> - initialized? IF
> > >> - my-phandle node>path open-dev ?dup IF
> > >> - virtiodev virtio-serial-shutdown
> > >> - close-dev
> > >> - THEN
> > >> - FALSE to initialized?
> > >> - THEN
> > >> + virtiodev virtio-serial-shutdown
> > >> + FALSE to initialized?
> > >> ;
> > >
> > > It now also calls virtio-serial-shutdown if it never was initialised?
> >
> >
> > No. This also removes "['] shutdown add-quiesce-xt" so the only way to
> > end up in "shutdown" is having open-count incremented == open virtio-serial.
>
> Anything can call shutdown, the nice simple name encourages that even.
> It's not a good idea to make this word more fragile, imho.
>
Makes sense. I'll fix that in a follow-up patch though because
Alexey already merged this.
>
> Segher
More information about the SLOF
mailing list