[SLOF] [PATCH slof] pci: Align PCI node names with QEMU
Alexey Kardashevskiy
aik at ozlabs.ru
Tue Oct 22 10:28:54 AEDT 2019
On 21/10/2019 18:41, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 21/10/2019 09.02, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> During the ibm,client-arhitecture-support client call, we rely on QEMU
>> providing a full device tree which SLOF then merged into its internal
>> tree so we rely on both SLOF and QEMU using the same node names for
>> devices of the same type.
>>
>> This changes device tree node names to what QEMU uses.
>>
>> The change was triggered by "(unknown-)legacy-device" which is used by
>> virtio-balloon; other changes either fix typos or remove devices which
>> are very unlikely to be implemented by QEMU for pseries, or even if they
>> are, we are ok with using generic class names anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>
>> This is to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1847440?comments=all
>>
>>
>> ---
>> slof/fs/pci-class-code-names.fs | 41 +++++----------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/slof/fs/pci-class-code-names.fs b/slof/fs/pci-class-code-names.fs
>> index 6cf3b8fd083c..cd9395fb47ba 100644
>> --- a/slof/fs/pci-class-code-names.fs
>> +++ b/slof/fs/pci-class-code-names.fs
>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>> : pci-class-name-00 ( addr -- str len )
>> pci-class@ 8 rshift FF and CASE
>> 01 OF s" display" ENDOF
>> - dup OF s" unknown-legacy-device" ENDOF
>> + dup OF s" legacy-device" ENDOF
>> ENDCASE
>> ;
>>
>> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@
>> : pci-class-name-03 ( addr -- str len )
>> pci-class@ FFFF and CASE
>> 0000 OF s" vga" ENDOF
>> - 0001 OF s" 8514-compatible" ENDOF
>> 0100 OF s" xga" ENDOF
>> 0200 OF s" 3d-controller" ENDOF
>> dup OF s" display" ENDOF
>> @@ -91,23 +90,9 @@
>> : pci-class-name-07 ( addr -- str len )
>> pci-class@ FFFF and CASE
>> 0000 OF s" serial" ENDOF
>> - 0001 OF s" 16450-serial" ENDOF
>> - 0002 OF s" 16550-serial" ENDOF
>> - 0003 OF s" 16650-serial" ENDOF
>> - 0004 OF s" 16750-serial" ENDOF
>> - 0005 OF s" 16850-serial" ENDOF
>> - 0006 OF s" 16950-serial" ENDOF
>> 0100 OF s" parallel" ENDOF
>> - 0101 OF s" bi-directional-parallel" ENDOF
>> - 0102 OF s" ecp-1.x-parallel" ENDOF
>> - 0103 OF s" ieee1284-controller" ENDOF
>> - 01FE OF s" ieee1284-device" ENDOF
>> 0200 OF s" multiport-serial" ENDOF
>> 0300 OF s" modem" ENDOF
>> - 0301 OF s" 16450-modem" ENDOF
>> - 0302 OF s" 16550-modem" ENDOF
>> - 0303 OF s" 16650-modem" ENDOF
>> - 0304 OF s" 16750-modem" ENDOF
>> 0400 OF s" gpib" ENDOF
>> 0500 OF s" smart-card" ENDOF
>> dup OF s" communication-controller" ENDOF
>> @@ -118,18 +103,9 @@
>> : pci-class-name-08 ( addr -- str len )
>> pci-class@ FFFF and CASE
>> 0000 OF s" interrupt-controller" ENDOF
>> - 0001 OF s" isa-pic" ENDOF
>> - 0002 OF s" eisa-pic" ENDOF
>> - 0010 OF s" io-apic" ENDOF
>> - 0020 OF s" iox-apic" ENDOF
>> 0100 OF s" dma-controller" ENDOF
>> - 0101 OF s" isa-dma" ENDOF
>> - 0102 OF s" eisa-dma" ENDOF
>> 0200 OF s" timer" ENDOF
>> - 0201 OF s" isa-system-timer" ENDOF
>> - 0202 OF s" eisa-system-timer" ENDOF
>> 0300 OF s" rtc" ENDOF
>> - 0301 OF s" isa-rtc" ENDOF
>> 0400 OF s" hot-plug-controller" ENDOF
>> 0500 OF s" sd-host-conrtoller" ENDOF
>> dup OF s" system-periphal" ENDOF
>> @@ -156,10 +132,7 @@
>
> I think I'd rather not remove the entries from class 7 and 8 ... for
> example, board-js2x uses a 16550 UART IIRC ... yeah, js2x is broken
> anyway, but in case somebody ever restores this board, we might need
> this again.
Why might we _need_ this? Does anything rely on the exact node name for these devices? I am not removing them, I am just
changing names, "compatible" should still be used to match the driver. What do I miss?
--
Alexey
More information about the SLOF
mailing list