[SLOF] [PATCH v4 00/33] Add vTPM support to SLOF
Alexey Kardashevskiy
aik at ozlabs.ru
Sat Dec 28 15:11:25 AEDT 2019
On 28/12/2019 08:13, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 12/23/19 6:41 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>
>> On 24/12/2019 08:40, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>> On 12/18/19 6:05 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> It's been a while since the last attempt :) 33 is a lot! Comments
>>>> below...
>>> I have a series of patches now here with some of the concerns addressed.
>>> I would say it's bisectable but my concern is that reshuffling more code
>>> will cause issues that aren't there right now. So I would appreciate
>>> some tolerance for refactoring while building up TPM 2 support.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/stefanberger/SLOF-tpm/commits/SLOF-tpm.Dec2019.23
>> imho you are overthinking this. This needs to be several prerequisite
>> patches (one per lib/directory/driver/whatever), one patch for vtpm v1
>
> What are prerequisites? Are these functions needed by lib/libtpm but are located in other directories?
Yes.
> I have certainly
> not put the patches in random order, so they do compile at every step and functions needed in one step are introduced
> before it.
Good.
>> (and I still eagerly want to hear why we want v1 at all), one patch for
>
> The application stack for TSS 1.2 is (still) being packaged for ppc64le:
Ok. But what about v2.0? "trousers" does not support it?
>
> https://packages.ubuntu.com/eoan/trousers
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5471
>
> https://software.opensuse.org/package/trousers
>
> https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=trousers
>
>
>
>
>> vtpm v2, one patch for the menu. "One patch" could be more if patch 1
>> adds some function on its own and consequent patches enhance patch 1
>> (such as add vtpm with 1 algo enabled in patch 1 and then add other
>> hashing algorithms later) but I do not see this happening or very
>> useful. Thanks,
>
> I tried to make it small patches for easier digestion...
Not seeing how helpers are actually used does not help much and bisectability suffers as well. Thanks,
--
Alexey
More information about the SLOF
mailing list