[SLOF] [PATCH] scsi: implement READ (16) command
Alexey Kardashevskiy
aik at ozlabs.ru
Wed Oct 12 11:48:34 AEDT 2016
On 28/09/16 17:03, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 28.09.2016 08:37, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>>> For disks bigger than 2TB(512B sector size), read-10 would fail as it is
>>> limited by the block address(4bytes). Add and use SCSI command READ(16)
>>> which has 8bytes block address.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> slof/fs/scsi-disk.fs | 2 +-
>>> slof/fs/scsi-support.fs | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/slof/fs/scsi-disk.fs b/slof/fs/scsi-disk.fs
>>> index 2f7d740..83aab89 100644
>>> --- a/slof/fs/scsi-disk.fs
>>> +++ b/slof/fs/scsi-disk.fs
>>> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ CREATE cdb 10 allot
>>> >r rot r> ( block# #blocks addr len )
>>> 2swap ( addr len block# #blocks )
>>> dup >r
>>> - cdb scsi-build-read-10 ( addr len )
>>> + cdb scsi-build-read-16 ( addr len )
>>> r> -rot ( #blocks addr len )
>>> scsi-dir-read cdb scsi-param-size 10
>>> retry-scsi-command
>>
>> I'm feeling a little bit uneasy about using READ-16 here
>> unconditionally... IIRC, the scsi stack is also used for USB devices,
>> and these often used to only implement the bare minimum of SCSI
>> commands, i.e. things like READ-16 are likely not supported there.
>> Could you maybe add a check if the block address can not be stored in 4
>> bytes anymore, and only use the READ-16 in that case?
>
> Yeah sure, that can be done. How about this:
>
> cdb ( addr len block# #blocks cdb )
> max-block-num FFFFFFFF > IF
> scsi-build-read-16 ( addr len )
> ELSE
> scsi-build-read-10 ( addr len )
> THEN
> r> -rot ( #blocks addr len )
You'll repost the patch, right?
--
Alexey
More information about the SLOF
mailing list