[SLOF] [PATCH slof v2] instance: Fix set-my-args for empty arguments

Alexey Kardashevskiy aik at ozlabs.ru
Wed Aug 24 16:58:17 AEST 2016


On 23/08/16 08:29, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 22.08.2016 06:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>>
>> It would put the pointer and len in the wrong order in the instance>args
>> buffer. As alloc-mem can handle zero length itself (and return NULL),
>> this also removes "if" to make the code simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>> [aik: removed "if" as Segher suggested]
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>  slof/fs/instance.fs | 10 +++-------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/slof/fs/instance.fs b/slof/fs/instance.fs
>> index 9e5c921..9159a5d 100644
>> --- a/slof/fs/instance.fs
>> +++ b/slof/fs/instance.fs
>> @@ -129,13 +129,9 @@ CONSTANT <instancevariable>
>>  
>>  \ copy args from original instance to new created
>>  : set-my-args   ( old-addr len -- )
>> -   dup IF                             \ IF len > 0                    ( old-addr len )
>> -      dup alloc-mem                   \ | allocate space for new args ( old-addr len new-addr )
>> -      2dup my-self instance>args 2!   \ | write into instance struct  ( old-addr len new-addr )
>> -      swap move                       \ | and copy the args           ( )
>> -   ELSE                               \ ELSE                          ( old-addr len )
>> -      my-self instance>args 2!        \ | set new args to zero, too   ( )
>> -   THEN                               \ FI
>> +   dup alloc-mem                   \ | allocate space for new args ( old-addr len new-addr )
>> +   2dup my-self instance>args 2!   \ | write into instance struct  ( old-addr len new-addr )
>> +   swap move                       \ | and copy the args           ( )
> 
> I think you could now remove the pipe --^ characters in the comment now
> that the IF-statement is gone. Apart from that cosmetic nit, the patch
> looks fine to me.

Yup, pushed without pipes, thanks for the review.


> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com>
> 


-- 
Alexey


More information about the SLOF mailing list