[SLOF] [PATCH 1/2] ping: use gateway address for routing
thuth at redhat.com
Fri Apr 22 18:10:47 AEST 2016
On 22.04.2016 09:39, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> writes:
>> Sorry again for not using the right terms ... I meant the specifying the
>> prefix length (and thus the netmask) with a CIDR prefix notation, see
>> That means, it might maybe be useful to support specifying the client
>> address with a prefix length like this:
>> load net:192.168.3.2,filename,192.168.1.10/24
>> What do you think?
> So that will be client-ip/nn, we need to take care we dont break old
> cases. how about
> Currently, its this
> Change that to:
> One more argument at the end.
That would of course work, too. But actually, I already always have a
hard time to remember the current order of the arguments here ... adding
some more does not sound too appealing to me.
There is one more thing to consider: IPv6. Currently, the IPv6 code
silently assumes a prefix length of 64 for all addresses (I think),
which works in most cases, but is technically also wrong, of course. So
we might need a way to specify the prefix length / netmask for IPv6,
too, one day. And for IPv6, you certainly don't want to type the whole
netmask but use the /prefixlen notation instead. So I'd recommend to use
that for IPv4 here, too, to keep both as close as possible.
More information about the SLOF