[Pdbg] [PATCH v2 1/7] libpdbg: Store fsi_fd state information in fsi structure

Alistair Popple alistair at popple.id.au
Mon Jun 15 17:52:03 AEST 2020


On Monday, 15 June 2020 5:37:44 PM AEST Amitay Isaacs wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 17:22 +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 3:24:20 PM AEST Amitay Isaacs wrote:
> > > This allows to have different fd for different fsi targets.  Also,
> > > we
> > > can close the fd cleanly in release procedure.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay at ozlabs.org>
> > > ---
> > >  libpdbg/hwunit.h |  1 +
> > >  libpdbg/kernel.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> > > ----
> > >  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/libpdbg/hwunit.h b/libpdbg/hwunit.h
> > > index 61aea0f..e3a8426 100644
> > > --- a/libpdbg/hwunit.h
> > > +++ b/libpdbg/hwunit.h
> > > @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct fsi {
> > >  	int (*read)(struct fsi *, uint32_t, uint32_t *);
> > >  	int (*write)(struct fsi *, uint32_t, uint32_t);
> > >  	enum chip_type chip_type;
> > > +	int fd;
> > >  };
> > >  #define target_to_fsi(x) container_of(x, struct fsi, target)
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/libpdbg/kernel.c b/libpdbg/kernel.c
> > > index c4637a7..7914e50 100644
> > > --- a/libpdbg/kernel.c
> > > +++ b/libpdbg/kernel.c
> > > @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
> > >  #define OPENFSI_LEGACY_PATH "/sys/bus/platform/devices/gpio-fsi/"
> > >  #define OPENFSI_PATH "/sys/class/fsi-master/"
> > >  
> > > -int fsi_fd;
> > >  const char *fsi_base;
> > >  
> > >  const char *kernel_get_fsi_path(void)
> > > @@ -66,14 +65,14 @@ static int kernel_fsi_getcfam(struct fsi *fsi,
> > > uint32_t 
> > addr64, uint32_t *value)
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  	uint32_t tmp, addr = (addr64 & 0x7ffc00) | ((addr64 & 0x3ff) <<
> > > 2);
> > >  
> > > -	rc = lseek(fsi_fd, addr, SEEK_SET);
> > > +	rc = lseek(fsi->fd, addr, SEEK_SET);
> > >  	if (rc < 0) {
> > >  		rc = errno;
> > >  		PR_WARNING("seek failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > >  		return rc;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	rc = read(fsi_fd, &tmp, 4);
> > > +	rc = read(fsi->fd, &tmp, 4);
> > >  	if (rc < 0) {
> > >  		rc = errno;
> > >  		if ((addr64 & 0xfff) != 0xc09)
> > > @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ static int kernel_fsi_putcfam(struct fsi *fsi,
> > > uint32_t 
> > addr64, uint32_t data)
> > >  	int rc;
> > >  	uint32_t tmp, addr = (addr64 & 0x7ffc00) | ((addr64 & 0x3ff) <<
> > > 2);
> > >  
> > > -	rc = lseek(fsi_fd, addr, SEEK_SET);
> > > +	rc = lseek(fsi->fd, addr, SEEK_SET);
> > >  	if (rc < 0) {
> > >  		rc = errno;
> > >  		PR_WARNING("seek failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> > > @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ static int kernel_fsi_putcfam(struct fsi *fsi,
> > > uint32_t 
> > addr64, uint32_t data)
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	tmp = htobe32(data);
> > > -	rc = write(fsi_fd, &tmp, 4);
> > > +	rc = write(fsi->fd, &tmp, 4);
> > >  	if (rc < 0) {
> > >  		rc = errno;
> > >  		PR_ERROR("Failed to write to 0x%08" PRIx32 " (%016"
> > > PRIx32 ")\n", 
> > addr, addr64);
> > > @@ -111,16 +110,6 @@ static int kernel_fsi_putcfam(struct fsi *fsi,
> > > uint32_t 
> > addr64, uint32_t data)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -#if 0
> > > -/* TODO: At present we don't have a generic destroy method as
> > > there aren't 
> > many
> > > - * use cases for it. So for the moment we can just let the OS
> > > close the file
> > > - * descriptor on exit. */
> > > -static void kernel_fsi_destroy(struct pdbg_target *target)
> > > -{
> > > -	close(fsi_fd);
> > > -}
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > >  static void kernel_fsi_scan_devices(void)
> > >  {
> > >  	const char one = '1';
> > > @@ -154,51 +143,59 @@ static void kernel_fsi_scan_devices(void)
> > >  
> > >  int kernel_fsi_probe(struct pdbg_target *target)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (!fsi_fd) {
> > > -		int tries = 5;
> > > -		int rc;
> > > -		const char *kernel_path = kernel_get_fsi_path();
> > > -		char *path;
> > > -
> > > -		if (!kernel_path)
> > > -			return -1;
> > > -
> > > -		rc = asprintf(&path, "%s/fsi0/slave at 00:00/raw", 
> > kernel_get_fsi_path());
> > > -		if (rc < 0) {
> > > -			PR_ERROR("Unable create fsi path\n");
> > > -			return rc;
> > > -		}
> > > +	struct fsi *fsi = target_to_fsi(target);
> > > +	int tries = 5;
> > > +	int rc;
> > > +	const char *kernel_path = kernel_get_fsi_path();
> > > +	char *path;
> > >  
> > > -		while (tries) {
> > > -			/* Open first raw device */
> > > -			fsi_fd = open(path, O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
> > > -			if (fsi_fd >= 0) {
> > > -				free(path);
> > > -				return 0;
> > > -			}
> > > -			tries--;
> > > -
> > > -			/* Scan */
> > > -			kernel_fsi_scan_devices();
> > > -			sleep(1);
> > > -		}
> > > -		if (fsi_fd < 0) {
> > > -			PR_ERROR("Unable to open %s\n", path);
> > > +	if (!kernel_path)
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +
> > > +	rc = asprintf(&path, "%s/fsi0/slave at 00:00/raw",
> > > kernel_get_fsi_path());
> > > +	if (rc < 0) {
> > > +		PR_ERROR("Unable create fsi path\n");
> > > +		return rc;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	while (tries) {
> > > +		/* Open first raw device */
> > > +		fsi->fd = open(path, O_RDWR | O_SYNC);
> > > +		if (fsi->fd >= 0) {
> > >  			free(path);
> > > -			return -1;
> > > +			return 0;
> > 
> > Minor nit that doesn't need fixing but IMHO it would probably have
> > been clearer 
> > to make this a for loop and break out rather than return.
> 
> I can still do that, if that'll make things clearer.
> 
> > 
> > >  		}
> > > +		tries--;
> > >  
> > > +		/* Scan */
> > > +		kernel_fsi_scan_devices();
> > > +		sleep(1);
> > > +	}
> > > +	if (fsi->fd < 0) {
> > > +		PR_ERROR("Unable to open %s\n", path);
> > > +		free(path);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	return -1;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void kernel_fsi_release(struct pdbg_target *target)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct fsi *fsi = target_to_fsi(target);
> > > +
> > > +	if (fsi->fd != -1) {
> > 
> > In theory I think generic pdbg logic should prevent this from ever
> > being false 
> > as release should only get called on a successful probe.
> 
> Yes, we can definitely drop the check.  I was going nuts trying to
> figure out what will happen with releasing virtual targets.  I am
> convinced now that each target will be released only once.

Maybe print a warning, but it doesn't really matter because I merged them 
anyway :-)

- Alistair

> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <alistair at popple.id.au>
> > 
> > > +		close(fsi->fd);
> > > +		fsi->fd = -1;
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static struct fsi kernel_fsi = {
> > >  	.target = {
> > >  		.name = "Kernel based FSI master",
> > >  		.compatible = "ibm,kernel-fsi",
> > >  		.class = "fsi",
> > >  		.probe = kernel_fsi_probe,
> > > +		.release = kernel_fsi_release,
> > >  	},
> > >  	.read = kernel_fsi_getcfam,
> > >  	.write = kernel_fsi_putcfam,
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Amitay.
> 






More information about the Pdbg mailing list