[Pdbg] [PATCH 2/3] istep: Use the first sbefifo to run isteps
Alistair Popple
alistair at popple.id.au
Thu Jul 11 15:35:12 AEST 2019
Does this just affect the default sbefifo? Ie. does it prevent a user explicitly
targeting the secondary sbefifo with -P sbefifo1 ? Seems like we should be able
to target either (although to be honest I'm not sure how much sense that makes
in practice as I haven't tried starting the secondary SBE yet).
- Alistair
On Thursday, 4 July 2019 6:11:32 PM AEST Amitay Isaacs wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay at ozlabs.org>
> ---
> src/istep.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/istep.c b/src/istep.c
> index a9acbe7..a141a31 100644
> --- a/src/istep.c
> +++ b/src/istep.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,18 @@ struct istep_data {
>
> static int istep(uint32_t major, uint32_t minor)
> {
> - struct pdbg_target *target;
> - int count = 0, i;
> + struct pdbg_target *sbefifo;
> + int count = 0, i, rc;
> +
> + for_each_path_target_class("sbefifo", sbefifo) {
> + if (pdbg_target_status(sbefifo) == PDBG_TARGET_ENABLED)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (sbefifo == NULL) {
> + fprintf(stderr, "No sbefifo found to run isteps\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> if (major < 2 || major > 5) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Istep major should be 2 to 5\n");
> @@ -56,16 +66,9 @@ static int istep(uint32_t major, uint32_t minor)
> }
> }
>
> - for_each_path_target_class("sbefifo", target) {
> - int rc;
> -
> - if (pdbg_target_status(target) != PDBG_TARGET_ENABLED)
> - continue;
> -
> - rc = sbe_istep(target, major, minor);
> - if (!rc)
> - count++;
> - }
> + rc = sbe_istep(sbefifo, major, minor);
> + if (!rc)
> + count++;
>
> return count;
> }
More information about the Pdbg
mailing list