RFE: use patchwork to submit a patch

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 09:19:11AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 05:35:53PM -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:

> > 1. provide a way for someone to submit a patch using a web interface   (but
> > still in a way that From: is their corporate ID)

> If you do this, what happens when a maintainer/reviewer responds to that
> patch and says "looks good, but can you change X and resend it?"

> How will they get that message if it didn't go through their email
> system?  How will they be able to respond to it?

If they're using their work e-mail address like Konstantin says they'll
get the reply there.  Probably any response from them will be some top
posted thing with HTML but this happens often enough currently - people
often use git send-email or something to send but continue using a mail
setup that's not really what's expected for kernel work.  Usually it's
not the end of the world even if people get a bit grumpy at them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/attachments/20191014/69ed99ac/attachment-0001.sig>