[PATCH] parser: Unmangle From: headers that have been mangled for DMARC purposes

[Junio C Hamano]

Jeff King <peff at peff.net> writes:

> This might provide an alternate solution (or vice versa). I kind of like
> this one better in that it doesn't require the sender to do anything
> differently (but it may be less robust, as it assumes the receiver
> reliably de-mangling).

I share the assessment.  I also feel that relying on Reply-To: would
make the result a lot less reliable (I do not have much problem with
the use of X-Original-Sender, though).