[PATCH v2 2/2] docs: Note new requirement to include a SPDX line
vkabatov at redhat.com
Tue Sep 18 03:34:19 AEST 2018
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Stephen Finucane" <stephen at that.guru>
> To: patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 7:19:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] docs: Note new requirement to include a SPDX line
> On Mon, 2018-09-17 at 18:17 +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> > Add some wording around the requirement to include this line instead
> > of
> > the license header. Also note the requirement that all code be
> > GPLv2-licensed and add a CONTRIBUTING document, which GitHub likes.
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen at that.guru>
> > Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja at axtens.net>
> Looks like patch 1/2 (or the earlier v1 rendition) didn't make it to
> the list. It's basically the following diff for all files:
> -# This file is part of the Patchwork package.
> -# Patchwork is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> -# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> -# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> -# (at your option) any later version.
> -# Patchwork is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> -# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> -# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> -# GNU General Public License for more details.
> -# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> -# along with Patchwork; if not, write to the Free Software
> -# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
This seems to be the same problem why my first tagging patch didn't make it
to the list - the email is too large and doesn't fit the mailing list
thresholds. Given how many files contain the preamble, the patch would need
to be split a lot to get it to the list.
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
More information about the Patchwork