Continuous integration with buildbot
andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com
Fri Oct 20 00:57:55 AEDT 2017
On 19/10/17 14:10, Russell Currey wrote:
> We were keen on supporting multiple CI backends (including Buildbot), but Andrew
> and I have been far too busy recently to work on it. It's definitely
> technically feasible in any case, and there's some code/ideas you could steal.
I'm hoping to have some time to work on things again in the next few
weeks, but adding a second CI backend is somewhat down the list of
priorities right now.
> - Russell
>>> Hello all,
>>> I'm guessing if one of you successfully enabled some linking between
>>> patchwork and buildbot .
>>> According to the patchwork documentation, checks must be done using the
>>> REST API.
>>> Does that mean we must implement a poller in the buildbot that checks
>>> for new patches? I have a few concerns:
>>> 1. I need to check how buildbot knows that a patch has already been
>>> tested to avoid rebuilding over and over,
>>> 2. I should also check how to make buildbot as secure as possible
>>> since tests can be ran with insecure code sent via mails.
>>> Any advices are welcome,
>>> : http://buildbot.net
>>> David Demelier
>>> Patchwork mailing list
>>> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
>> Patchwork mailing list
>> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
More information about the Patchwork