On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 18:56 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > We probably don't need these statements, but if we're going to include > them they should at least be complete. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja at axtens.net> Yup, looks a-ok. Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen at that.guru>