[PATCH 0/4] Resolve some issues with series-ification

Stephen Finucane stephen at that.guru
Wed May 31 06:12:46 AEST 2017

On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 07:02 +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> After watching the LKML mails pouring into daxten's Patchwork
> instance [1] for a few days, I've seen a couple of oddities that have
> broken series support in various ways. This series seeks to address
> the two biggest issues: mails that lack the 'In-Reply-To' and
> 'References' headers we currently rely on, and mails that contain
> multiple instances of these headers.
> Sample patches taken from that instance (with cruft removed) are
> included as part of the additional tests.

Given the inclusion of tests using real-world failing mails to validate
these patches, I'm happy to merge this as-is. Applied now.


More information about the Patchwork mailing list