v1 -> v2 migration tests

[Daniel Axtens]

Hi Stephen,

Thank you so much for such a detailed investigation! Very glad to hear
patchwork is doing the right things.

Regards,
Daniel

> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 11:16 +0100, Stephen Finucane wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 09:05 +1000, Daniel Axtens wrote:
>> > Hi Stephen,
>> > 
>> > > Thanks for doing this. I've tinkered with both instances and haven't seen
>> > > any
>> > > serious issues. I'm most happy with the fact that the performance of the
>> > > web UI
>> > > hasn't been altered (at least, from my brief testing).
>> > > 
>> > > I'm thinking we give this another day or two and we might be good to go?
>> > 
>> > Russell picked up one thing that looked questionable:
>> > https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/project/lkml/list/?series=&submitter=&state
>> > =&;
>> > q=powerpc%2Fnuma%3A+update&archive=&delegate=
>> > 
>> > It looks like it's slightly misthreaded; I haven't had a chance to dig
>> > into it properly just yet. It could well be that the code is correct and
>> > the messages were just sent with weird headers.
>> 
>> I took a look at the v6 versions of these...
>
> I also just took a look at "v1" (though it doesn't have a prefix, of course)
> and v5 of this over lunch. The "v1" patches/covers weren't threaded, but that's
> because they were missing references and in-reply-to headers. We've fixed this
> since those patches were merged, so were they to be parsed today that wouldn't
> happen. As for v5, from looking at marc.info [1], it would appear that patch
> 1/2 was never sent or never made it to the list. Patch 2/2 in this series is
> also missing 'References' and 'In-Reply-To' headers, but because the patches
> arrived *after* we'd fixed that issue, they're threaded correctly.
>
> Important metadata about the patches is provided below, but all in all, I think
> Patchwork is working a-ok, which is good to hear.
>
> Stephen
>
> PS: I can't comment on the quality of the patches themselves, but this guy
> really needs to start sending his patches with git-send-email instead of
> Thunderbird :)
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?a=145703388400001&r=1&w=2
>
> ---
>
> Original series ("v1"):
>
>   [0/2] powerpc/dlpar: Correct display of hot-add/hot-remove CPUs and memory
>     Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:15:11 -0500
>     Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
>       by patchwork.dja.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48630CA6D5
>       for <patchwork at patchwork.dja.id.au>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:15:45 +1000
>     Message-Id: <790af26b-7055-7997-2080-f967aef2d26d at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>     https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/cover/15561/
>
>   [1/2] powerpc/numa: Update CPU topology when VPHN enabled
>     Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:15:29 -0500
>     Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
>       by patchwork.dja.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4FDCA6D5
>       for <patchwork at patchwork.dja.id.au>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:15:47 +1000
>     Message-Id: <4a1bec9a-d3d2-c0bd-3956-e6e402be334c at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>     https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/patch/15562/
>
>   [2/2] : powerpc/hotplug/mm: Fix hot-add memory node assoc
>     Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:15:44 -0500
>     Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
>       by patchwork.dja.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222F2CA6D5
>       for <patchwork at patchwork.dja.id.au>; Wed, 24 May 2017 01:16:03 +1000
>     Message-Id: <3bb44d92-b2ff-e197-4bdf-ec6d588d6dab at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>     https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/patch/15563/
>
> Fifth revision (v5):
>
>   [V5,0/2] powerpc/dlpar: Correct display of hot-add/hot-remove CPUs and memory
>     Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 13:45:17 -0500
>     Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
>       by patchwork.dja.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDAFBE57D
>       for <patchwork at patchwork.dja.id.au>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:45:30 +1000
>     Message-Id: <2a7f2a4f-5885-d186-2baf-da72ce0712b2 at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>     https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/cover/27710/
>
>     [V5,2/2] powerpc/numa: Update CPU topology when VPHN enabled
>       Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 13:46:55 -0500
>       Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
>         by patchwork.dja.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FEBCE81B
>         for <patchwork at patchwork.dja.id.au>; Mon, 19 Jun 2017 04:47:11 +1000
>       Message-Id: <a98d9a2c-03e5-a078-0b1b-7f7da2cc8669 at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
>       https://py3.patchwork.dja.id.au/patch/27711/