[PATCH v6 3/8] parser: Add series parsing

Andrew Donnellan andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com
Thu Oct 27 19:51:41 AEDT 2016


On 16/10/16 23:50, Stephen Finucane wrote:
> It is now possible to parse and store series, so do just that.
> The parsing at the moment is based on both RFC822 headers and
> subject lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane <stephen at that.guru>

One minor issue below.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>

> +def parse_version(subject, subject_prefixes):
> +    """Extract patch version.
> +
> +    Args:
> +        subject: Main body of subject line
> +        subject_prefixes: List of subject prefixes to extract version
> +          from
> +
> +    Returns:
> +        version if found, else 1
> +    """
> +    regex = re.compile('^[vV](\d+)$')
> +    m = _parse_prefixes(subject_prefixes, regex)
> +    if m:
> +        return int(m.group(1))
> +
> +    m = re.search(r'\([vV](\d+)\)', subject)

A commit like "Input: drv260x - add TI drv260x haptics driver" will be 
picked up as v260 by this... I am struggling to think of a scenario 
where this actually results in a SeriesRevision being created, but 
nevertheless.

I assume based on the relevant test the idea is to pick up subjects like 
"Terribly formatted patch (v3)"?

Perhaps match against "[vN]", "(vN)", " vN ", "vN ", " vN"?

I don't hugely care if this gets fixed or not.

-- 
Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com  IBM Australia Limited



More information about the Patchwork mailing list