[PATCH] views: don't duplicate tags in patch message when generating mbox
Andrew Donnellan
andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com
Wed Nov 23 18:13:45 AEDT 2016
On 23/11/16 18:01, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> When generating an mbox for a patch with tags in the original commit
> message, e.g.:
>
> Example patch
>
> This patch is awesome!
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
>
> the tags from the original email are duplicated:
>
> Example patch
>
> This patch is awesome!
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
>
> It appears that during the refactoring in ef56359fb776 ("models: Merge
> patch and first comment"), we added a call to patch.patch_responses() to
> extract the tags from the initial patch email, which we then append to the
> patch email body... which already has the tags in it.
>
> Remove the unnecessary append of patch.patch_responses when generating an
> mbox.
>
> Fixes: ef56359fb776 ("models: Merge patch and first comment")
> Reported-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
>
> ---
>
> Stephen, does this look correct?
Would it be helpful to add a test that compares full mbox output to
catch stuff like this?
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
More information about the Patchwork
mailing list