[PATCH] views: don't duplicate tags in patch message when generating mbox

Andrew Donnellan andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com
Wed Nov 23 18:13:45 AEDT 2016


On 23/11/16 18:01, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> When generating an mbox for a patch with tags in the original commit
> message, e.g.:
>
>     Example patch
>
>     This patch is awesome!
>
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
>     Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
>
> the tags from the original email are duplicated:
>
>     Example patch
>
>     This patch is awesome!
>
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
>     Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
>     Acked-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
>
> It appears that during the refactoring in ef56359fb776 ("models: Merge
> patch and first comment"), we added a call to patch.patch_responses() to
> extract the tags from the initial patch email, which we then append to the
> patch email body... which already has the tags in it.
>
> Remove the unnecessary append of patch.patch_responses when generating an
> mbox.
>
> Fixes: ef56359fb776 ("models: Merge patch and first comment")
> Reported-by: Russell Currey <ruscur at russell.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com>
>
> ---
>
> Stephen, does this look correct?

Would it be helpful to add a test that compares full mbox output to 
catch stuff like this?

-- 
Andrew Donnellan              OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan at au1.ibm.com  IBM Australia Limited



More information about the Patchwork mailing list