sort order lost when updating patches
Len Brown
lenb at kernel.org
Sat May 14 22:21:08 AEST 2016
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas at google.com> wrote:
>> This is on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/. I
>> don't see the Patchwork version anywhere, but it's the new stuff.
>>
>> When I update a patch, e.g., to mark it superceded, the patch sort
>> order seems to revert back to date:
>>
>> - Click on "Submitter" heading to sort by submitter so I can remove
>> superceded patches.
>> - Mark superceded patches, set "Change state:" to "Superceded", click "update".
>> - I'm returned to patches sorted by *date*, not by submitter.
>>
>> This makes it a real pain to mark superceded patches.
Does it help to mark the superceded patch as "archived"?
Rafael relies heavily on patchwork, and "archived"
and delegation seem to be the key features he uses.
--
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Patchwork
mailing list