[RFC 08/11] REST: Add Patch mbox to the API

[Andy Doan]

On 05/09/2016 09:03 AM, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
> I don't know what the spec says, but I don't think this endpoint
> is necessary. We already have a way to get diffs and mboxes, so we
> can just provide links to that in our original 'patch' response.
> GitHub do something similar with their 'raw_url' parameter for gists
> [1]. Less endpoint + less code = winning?

It was in the spec, I'd vote for removing it and providing a URL to raw 
patch. I'll put that together in the next patchset.