[PATCH 00/10] Patchwork Autodelegate patches

[Finucane, Stephen]

On 04 Jan 10:03, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
> On 26 Dec 13:23, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > However, all this is me thinking out loud for now, and I'm busy enough
> > > reviewing patches and trying to get something approaching series
> > > support into upstream (plus, you know, my day job) to volunteer
> > > implementing this. As such, if you agree with my idea but don't think
> > > it worth the effort (or just flat out disagree) then I'm happy to
> > > give my review comments on this with an eye to merging it shortly. If
> > > you do agree though, maybe we should hold off merging this until we
> > > explore these options?
> > > 
> > > Thoughts?
> > 
> > I generally like implementing features in a generic way, but as an occasional 
> > patchwork user I have a hard time judging how useful it would be. The trust 
> > issue that Johannes raised should also be considered here, to make sure that a 
> > malicious user wont be able to take advantage of either the criteria or the 
> > action to attack the patchwork host.
> 
> Yeah, I haven't exactly scoped it out enough yet to begin working on
> it. It's probably best to add such a feature to the backlog and add it
> in the future if the need arises (i.e. we get another "hook"-style
> feature request). I'll work on getting this merged in the interim.
> 
> Stephen

All merged. Thanks very much folks :)

Stephen