Patch tagging/classification

Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau at
Tue Feb 9 04:50:40 AEDT 2016

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:18:53PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> I think it's not a big deal if patchwork sometimes doesn't recognize a
> new version of a series as being a new version, and leaves it to the
> project admins to mark the old version of the series as superseded
> manually.
> However, it is in my opinion much less acceptable to see patchwork
> losing some patches. I'd rather have too much patches in patchwork that
> I need to triage/classify/update rather than missing some contributions.

Agreed on both points. We did think about being able to edit
series/revision when the parsing goes wrong, but, to be honest, that's
not high on the priority list.

I only know about a handful of bugs that will lead to losing a patch, so
declaring the series support somewhat ready may not be that far away.


More information about the Patchwork mailing list