[PATCH 3/3] pwclient: basic python3 support

[Brian Norris]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:49:04PM +0000, Finucane, Stephen wrote:
> > (... and I see it was merged already. Cool.)
> 
> I had reviewed (and have also been using) the patches 1[1] and 3[2] in
> the series since the first time they were sent. Had the same trivial
> comment about the second one but I let it slip - it's a good fix and
> I'm eager to get this kind of stuff in and backlog cleared out.

Glad you're clearing the backlog!

> > Looks good to me, though I'm still a little green on Python 2/3
> > compatibility. I've been runnning this (plus other patches) since you
> 
> What are your thoughts on the use of 'six' for this stuff? Would it help you here?

I'm not very familiar, but before reading this email I was trying to
figure out the "best" interoperable way to replace dict.iteritems(), and
I see we could use six.iteritems(). So my initial review says "sure"!

Except then, we rely on PyPy and nonstandard libraries which doesn't
seem too good to me for such a small utility :(

Brian