[PATCH] models: Don't munge the 'From' field of patches

Wolfram Sang wsa at the-dreams.de
Fri Nov 15 04:31:28 EST 2013

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:04:07AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> > Sounds reasonable to me, except I'd modify it to say that we don't
> > update the Person.name field for anyone who has actually ever logged
> > into patchwork.  This allows people who care to prevent abuse.  I can
> > just imagine someone sending some sort of email with my email address
> > and the real name "Captain Dumbohead".  It would update things
> > everywhere!  ;)
> Yes, good point.
> > The above also seems like something I could conceivably tackle, so
> > I'll put it on my list and try to get to it in the next few weeks.
> Awesome, thanks. Don't forget to use the test infrastructure, I find it
> really helpful when developing features like this. Happy to give you a
> hand with this if you like.
> > -Captain Dumbohead
> I can update the patchwork instance on patchwork.ozlabs.org manually, if
> you like? :D

Ping. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/288221/

Yes, I always ping when James gets another patch accepted...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/attachments/20131114/2dbf2eaa/attachment.sig>

More information about the Patchwork mailing list