Using the From: address specified in the body
guilherme.salgado at linaro.org
Sat Mar 19 08:29:00 EST 2011
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 23:20 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 March 2011 23:06, Guilherme Salgado <guilherme.salgado at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 13:50 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Em 16-03-2011 11:03, Guilherme Salgado escreveu:
> >> > I see that some emails with patches have a From: field in the body,
> >> > and I'm wondering if there's any reason for not using that (when
> >> > available, of course) as the patch submitter. Well, now that I think of
> >> > it, one could argue that the submitter is whoever sent the email, but
> >> > maybe it would be useful to have a 'author' field on Patch so that we
> >> > can properly represent cases where submitter != author?
> >> For example, I've seem a few patches that have email references. It would
> >> not be impossible to see a "From: " or "Author: " in the middle of such
> >> references.
> > That's a good point, but I think we could avoid that if we were
> > conservative and just used a 'From:' when it's at the beginning of a
> > line and that line is before the beginning of the diff.
> Presumably what you actually want to do is accept From: lines in the
> body in exactly the cases where 'git am' accepts them, since that's
> the patch-email syntax where this case actually apperas in practice...
> git am is more restrictive than just "at beginning of the line and
> before the diff".
I think that's right.
> Here's an example where the From: in the body and the email
> From: don't match (not even the same person), because the patch was
> written by Christophe but (re)transmitted to the list by me as part
> of a larger patchset:
I can't reach ozlabs.org since yesterday. Is it just me or is it
> Guilherme: presumably Linaro will want to make a distinction
> between "Linaro wrote this" and "a Linaro person is doing
> upstream submaintainer type work with othre peoples' contributions"
> in our patch counting metrics? (if so, there's your test case :-))
Yes, I'm sure we'll need to do that at some point, so I'll make sure
whatever solution I come up with will be able to parse multiple 'From:'
lines in the body.
> For completeness, should we support the git am "Subject: can
> be at the start of the body" syntax too?
If that's used frequently, I think so.
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Patchwork