Merging patches

martin f krafft madduck at
Wed Feb 10 14:21:03 EST 2010

also sprach martin f krafft <madduck at> [2010.02.10.1617 +1300]:
> If someone replies to a patch thread with a broken mailer, and an
> updated patch is sent without In-Reply-To, Patchwork ends up
> creating two patches for it. I could mark the former superseded, but
> that means that all the discussion would be gone too.

In fact, it seems that Patchwork sometimes just screws up. was sent
in direct reply to, but
Patchwork still generated

Mbox with the two messages attached.

What's wrong with that?

martin | |
"she is absolutely inadmissible into society. many a woman has a past,
 but I am told that she has at least a dozen, and that they all fit."
                                                        -- oscar wilde
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pw.mbox.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5018 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see
URL: <>

More information about the Patchwork mailing list