SPDM Daemon status & Collaboration

[Zhichuang Sun]

Hi Manoj,

We have already upstreamed our spdmd to https://github.com/google/spdmd. We
are looking forward to adding recipe files into openbmc so that it can be
tested with it.

Thank you,
Zhichuang

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 4:41 AM Manojkiran Eda <manojkiran.eda at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Zhichuang,
>
> I hope you are doing well.
>
> I noticed that the SPDM daemon design document where you were the
> primary contributor was merged around Feb 2023 [1]; however, I have not
> seen any corresponding repository creation or code contributions since
> then. At IBM, we are keen on leveraging the recently released SPDM over
> TCP specification from DMTF [2] and extending the existing design to
> support attestation over TCP [3].
>
> I wanted to check whether you are still interested in up-streaming the
> implementation. If so, I would be delighted to collaborate and
> contribute the necessary enhancements to accommodate TCP-based use
> cases. If you don’t intend to upstream, I am happy to
> contribute/maintain code & develop a solution that ensures the stack is
> architected to seamlessly scale for both TCP and MCTP transport mechanisms.
>
> I look forward to your thoughts and the opportunity to collaborate.
>
>
> **References:**
> 1.
>
> https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/designs/redfish-spdm-attestation.md
>
> 2. https://gerrit.openbmc.org/c/openbmc/docs/+/78257
> 3.
>
> https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0287_1.0.0.pdf
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Manoj
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20250226/1003ff53/attachment.htm>