Ampere's CCLA Schedule A update 2025-02-10

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 06:41 +0000, Thang Nguyen OS wrote:
> Thanks Andrew for your feedback. Please see my comment inline
> 
> > On 14 Feb 2025, at 12:23, Andrew Jeffery <andrew at codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 04:17 +0000, Thang Nguyen OS wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew Geissler,
> > > Attachment is the updated schedule A of CCLA from Ampere.
> > > 
> > > Please help review.
> > > 
> > > Note that Hieu Le will replace me as Ampere CLA Manager. I will check
> > > with you in Discord to change maintainer access from me to Hieu for
> > > what I am handling (openbmc/meta-ampere and ampere-ipmi-oem,
> > > ssifbridge).
> > 
> > I don't have concerns with Hieu replacing you as CLA manager, however
> > the expectations are different for maintenance roles. Background here:
> > 
> > https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/community-membership.md
> > 
> > Specifically:
> > 
> > * https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/community-
> >   membership.md#platform-maintainer
> > * https://github.com/openbmc/docs/blob/master/community-
> >   membership.md#subproject-owner
> > 
> > openbmc/meta-ampere still has Thu as maintainer, ampere-ipmi-oem has
> > Dung, and ssifbridge still has Chuong. These won't become unmaintained.
> Actually, Chuong changed to another role in Ampere before so I am the one who reviewed and merged changes in ssifbridge so far.
> Dung is inactive in ampere-ipmi-oem also.

Okay. I think it's fine if they become formally unmaintained, if that's
what your situation requires. The technical oversight forum can move
things forward if/when necessary by introducing new maintainers in
accordance with community expectations.

> > 
> > Hieu should be subject to the expectations outlined in the community
> > membership document, as everyone else is. Currently Hieu has few
> > changes pushed to Gerrit.
> Do you think I should update the Ampere CCLA to add me as member again so that I will continue to maintain these repos until Hieu satisfies requirements?

I'm not sure. Does that make sense for your situation?

Andrew