Proposal: Removing redundant EpochTime interface from dump entry

[dhruvaraj S]

On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 22:02, Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:13:44PM +0530, dhruvaraj S wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 21:09, Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 08:52:15AM +0530, dhruvaraj S wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like the potential concern would be with bmcweb.  There appears
> > > to maybe be some common code related to LogServices that expects all
> > > logs to have the Time.EpochTime interface.  Are you going to add
> > > alternative code there to look at the Common.Progress interface instead?
> > > Is this acceptable to the bmcweb side?
> >
> > Common.Progress interface is already implemented in dump entry and
> > bmcweb reads that
> > for the status of the dump, now that needs to be extended to read the
> > CompletedTime also.
>
> Are you planning to do that work or is this a call for assistance?
I can make that change, but sent this note to understand if any more concerns
>
> --
> Patrick Williams



-- 
--------------
Dhruvaraj S