[PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: nuvoton: Add DT compatible

[Mining Lin]

Dear Paul,

Thank you for your comments.
I  originally wanted to judge whether to match chip data by DT compatible, but it does not make sense.
Therefore, I will remove it in the v4 version.

Thanks.
Best regard,
Mia

> On Aug 10, 2023, at 3:55 PM, Paul Menzel <pmenzel at molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear Mia,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch. It’d be great if you mentioned nct3015y in the commit message summary/title. Maybe:
> 
> dt-bindings: rtc: Add compatible nct3015y to nuvoton,nct3018y
> 
>> Am 09.08.23 um 11:51 schrieb Mia Lin:
>> Add DT compatible "nuvoton,nct3015y" to select
> 
> What do you mean by “to select”?
> 
> Also, maybe add how you tested this.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Mia Lin <mimi05633 at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nuvoton,nct3018y.yaml | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nuvoton,nct3018y.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nuvoton,nct3018y.yaml
>> index 4f9b5604acd9..67fc60fd395c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nuvoton,nct3018y.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/nuvoton,nct3018y.yaml
>> @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ maintainers:
>>    properties:
>>    compatible:
>> -    const: nuvoton,nct3018y
>> +    enum:
>> +      - nuvoton,nct3018y
>> +      - nuvoton,nct3015y
> 
> Would sorting the list be useful?
> 
>>    reg:
>>      maxItems: 1
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul