Usage of SHA384 signature for FIT image instead of SHA256

[Patrick Williams]

On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:56:10PM +0530, Gangadhar N wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am facing an issue while using SHA384 signature for FIT image instead of
> SHA256. I get build errors.
...

> uboot-mkimage Can't add hashes to FIT blob: -93
> Unsupported hash algorithm (sha384) for 'hash at 1' hash node in 'kernel at 1'
> image node

This is reporting that the mkimage tool generated by u-boot doesn't
support SHA384.  Which u-boot are you attempting to use?  It appears
that v2016.07 doesn't support sha384 but v2019.04 likely does.

-- 
Patrick Williams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20220531/1e88ab69/attachment.sig>