Usage of SHA384 signature for FIT image instead of SHA256

[Gangadhar N]

Hi Patrick,
I am using 2020.10 uboot

Thanks & Regards,
Gangadhar

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 7:14 PM Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz> wrote:

> On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 02:56:10PM +0530, Gangadhar N wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I am facing an issue while using SHA384 signature for FIT image instead
> of
> > SHA256. I get build errors.
> ...
>
> > uboot-mkimage Can't add hashes to FIT blob: -93
> > Unsupported hash algorithm (sha384) for 'hash at 1' hash node in 'kernel at 1'
> > image node
>
> This is reporting that the mkimage tool generated by u-boot doesn't
> support SHA384.  Which u-boot are you attempting to use?  It appears
> that v2016.07 doesn't support sha384 but v2019.04 likely does.
>
> --
> Patrick Williams
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20220601/85c9bc9b/attachment.htm>